A) Ready for the regulator: the importance of equality of arms
Equality of arms sounds like an expression more suited to a military theatre rather than a legal one. But we are hearing it increasingly in the corporate and litigation arenas and there’s good reason for its recent emergence. Consider the following for a moment: you are a corporate legal head and you contact your lawyers in a panic because a regulator has asked you to 'comply' with certain regulatory procedures in supplying emails relating to a particular contract expedited over a two year period.
That same regulator has tools that will immediately get to the core of the matter within hours. You, the corporate (and your law firm), have to image two years of electronic data forensically, then pre-process and process it before you can get it onto a review platform – it’s only at this point that you can start to distil the information expertly albeit not so quickly. Government and City watchdogs and many proactive private and public corporations are now using cutting-edge IT solutions that make these traditional yet cumbersome methodologies quite simply redundant.
So what if you leverage the same tools they’re using? How much more defensible is your client's case? What if you can respond within hours instead of days or weeks? With such tools now cost-effectively delivered and professionally supported by specialists like Legal Inc, a level playing field should be within everyone’s reach. For too long, technology has been used as a weapon by the ‘haves’ against the ‘have-nots’. Join us at our session to discover how equality of arms is putting an end to unequal fights – and to uncertain outcomes when the regulator comes knocking.
|
Nick Pollard Head of Client Management Legal Inc
|
Matthew Davis Litigation Support Lawyer Lovells LLP
|
|
Peter Cladouhos Esq, Practice Support Electronic Discovery Consultan Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP
|
Chris Dale The e-Disclosure Information Project
|
|
Vince Neicho
Litigation Support Specialist
Allen & Overy
|
Bill Sillett
Enforcement Officer
Financial Services Authority
|
|
Antony Montague
Associate General Counsel
McGraw Hill Companies
|
|
B) Balancing Cost, Time and Quality when looking for electronic evidence
Electronically Stored Information (ESI) is pivotal to all modern factual review exercises. Whether you are reviewing historic data for present business purposes, responding to a regulatory enquiry, conducting an internal investigation or examining evidence in a dispute and providing disclosure of relevant documentation, the likelihood is that ESI will contain important evidence relevant to that review. Moreover, the ESI most likely to contain the most useful information (particularly emails) is likely to be in unstructured format. Finding that kind of crucial piece of evidence in the mountain of available unstructured ESI can feel akin to searching a landfill site for one discarded receipt. It is a significant challenge. The time and cost of conducting such an exercise can very easily get out of hand and become disproportionate to the issues under consideration.
It is crucially important to retain focus on the purpose of the review, to monitor regularly the costs and benefits of the steps being undertaken and to be prepared to call a halt to particular activities when they are reaping diminishing returns. Both anecdotally and according to independent surveys (eg Socha-Gelbmann), the project management necessary to enable such informed client decision making is one of the most significant areas of dissatisfaction amongst clients experienced in conducting such reviews of ESI for disputes, investigations and other purposes. The purpose of this workshop is to empower corporate and law firm clients alike to monitor and improve project management practices associated with the search for electronic evidence. Sharing direct client-side experience, the aim is to enable clients to take control of the process. This is a practical session. Issues we will address include:
- Emphasis on proportionality
- Impact of Lord Jackson’s review
- First hand experiences of project management
- Common pitfalls and complaints
- Project management tools and techniques
- Coherent project plan articulation
- Effective progress tracking and communications
|
Sanjay Bhandari Partner Ernst & Young
|
Brian Stuart Assistant Director Ernst & Young
|
|